M. van Ginkel, L. Gilchrist, and C. Velazquez

In the CIMMYT bread wheat breeding effort we generate materials intended for higher rainfall areas in the developing world, among other mega-environments. In high rainfall environments, the major wheat production constraints are diseases plus certain abiotic stresses, such as waterlogging, sprouting-prone conditions and, sometimes, nutrient imbalances (both deficiency and toxicity). However, the most observable stresses are the biotic ones. Of these, yellow or stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis) and leaf or brown rust (P. recondita) are often obvious, in particular the first, plus such foliar blights as Septoria tritici, tan spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis), and very occasionally Septoria nodorum and Fusarium nivale on the leaves. The main virus disease is BYDV.

Among diseases affecting the spike, Fusarium head scab (FHS), induced by various Fusarium species, is the number one problem, and seems to be expanding. The recent increase in this disease globally is probably due to the expansion of what are ironically called (from a disease standpoint) more sustainable production methods, such as zero, minimum, or reduced tillage, plus the intensification of rotations, in particular those including corn (maize), an alternate host of Fusarium spp.

As FHS spreads and causes damage by reducing the amount of harvested seed and contaminating the grain with toxins, joint efforts to combat this scourge have increased. This meeting is witness to such efforts. Key among approaches to control the disease is the incorporation of genetic resistance.

The CIMMYT program requests, receives, and specifically develops genetically diverse germplasm with resistance to FHS. Various reports documenting these sources are available (Gilchrist et al., 1997a, 1997b; 1999). Also, genetic studies aimed at determining modes of inheritance have been carried out and published (Singh et al., 1995; Van Ginkel et al., 1996). In recent years efforts by the pathology group have concentrated on differentiating germplasm in regard to the four types of resistance commonly applied in FHS (I, II, III, and IV). Our breeding strategy has focused on combining different resistances in adapted backgrounds (Singh and van Ginkel, 1997).

Two areas of recent research on FHS are reported here.

Three crosses were made among three resistance sources considered likely to be different based on their genealogy. We chose two parents (1 and 2, below) whose pedigrees contain no Chinese germplasm. The three parents were:

  1. Gov/Az//Mus/3/Dodo/4/Bow
  2. Bau/Milan
  3. Catbird

Though the study continues, data from the first cycle of artificial inoculation with Fusarium graminearum isolates from Mexico have shown the following. It has proven very easy to select F5 lines that have levels of resistance twice that of either parent in all three possible intercrosses. Although two of the parents were not derived from Chinese germplasm, progress could easily be made. This indicates that different genes with accumulative effects (additive or multiplicative) are available in "common" germplasm. In fact, all parents have a very desirable agronomic type, combine readily, and in many respects are rather good parents to use in a breeding program, apart from their FHS resistance.


Fig. 1. Cross of Gov/Az//Mus/3/Dodo/4/Bow with Catbird. Both parents and 197 derived F5 lines are depicted against their response to infection to Fusarium graminearum, measured as Type II resistance.


Fig. 2. Cross of Bau/Milan with Catbird. Both parents and195 derived F5 lines are depicted against their response to infection to Fusarium graminearum, measured as Type II resistance.

 
 

Fig. 3. Cross of Gov/Az//Mus/3/Dodo/4/Bow with Bau/Milan. Both parents and 195 derived F5 lines are depicted against their response to infection to Fusarium graminearum, measured as Type II resistance.

Finally, we report that we have recently confirmed a group of relatively new CIMMYT bread wheat lines to have high levels of resistance to FHS, and that until now have not yet been commonly used around the world in breeding programs targeting scab. These entries are listed in the Table.

Table. Newly confirmed CIMMYT bread wheat lines carrying Type II resistance to FHS with infection values of less than 6%. The first five entries are comparative checks
Cross Selection History Resistance
Type II (%)
MAYOOR Check: Moderately Resistant 7.91
SUMAI#3 Check: Moderately Resistant 9.20
SERI/CEP80120 Check: Moderately Susceptible 14.84
FLYCATCHER Check: Moderately Susceptible 21.04
BCN//DOY1/AE.SQUARROSA (447) Check: Susceptible 32.93
     
SHA3/CBRD CMSS92Y00595S-1SCM-0CHN-015Y-3SCM 2.50
NG8675/CBRD CMSS92Y00639S-1-5SCM-2M-6Y-010SCM-0Y-0SCM 2.52
HXL8088/DUCULA CMSS93Y02492S-2Y-010M-010Y-010M-10Y-1M-0Y-3SJ-0Y 2.59
CROC_1/AE.SQUARROSA (205)//BORL95 CIGM90.250-4Y-3B-4Y-0B-2M-24M-0Y-010SCM-0Y-0Y-0Y 3.41
GUAM92//PSN/BOW CMSS92M01860S-015M-0Y-050M-0Y-11M-0Y 3.64
TNMU/3/JUP/BJY//SARA CMBW91M02016S-0M-040Y-1AL-2AL-7Y-0M-3SJ-0Y 3.70
R37/GHL121//KAL/BB/3/JUP/MUS/4/2*YMI #6/5/CBRD CMBW91Y01575S-4Y-010M-010Y-015M-2Y-0M-1SCM-010Y-010SCM-1PZ-0Y 4.31
MILAN/DUCULA CMSS93B01075S-74Y-010M-010Y-010M-8Y-0M-2SJ-0Y 4.72
THB//MAYA/NAC/3/RABE/4/MILAN CMSS92Y02157T-50Y-015M-010Y-010Y-9M-0Y 4.84
NG8319//SHA4/LIRA CMBW90M2302-6M-010M-010Y-015M-6Y-0M-0ECU-0Y 4.84
SHA3/SERI//SHA4/LIRA CMBW90M2468-12M-010M-010Y-015M-9Y-0M-0URY 4.85
R37/GHL121//KAL/BB/3/JUP/MUS/4/2*YMI #6/5/CBRD CMBW91Y01575S-4Y-010M-010Y-015M-5Y-0M 4.92
NG8319//SHA4/LIRA CMBW90M2302-6M-010M-010Y-015M-8Y-0M-5SJ-0Y 4.92
SHA3/SERI//SHA4/LIRA CMBW90M2468-12M-010M-010Y-015M-6Y-0M-3SJ-0Y 5.00
KAUZ/TNMU CMSS93B01069S-54Y-010M-010Y-010M-8Y-0M-3PZ-0Y 5.00
MAYOOR//TK SN1081/AE.SQUARROSA (222) CASS94Y00009S-18PR-2M-0M-1Y-0M 5.00
SHA3/SERI//G.C.W 1/SERI CMBW91Y01596S-2Y-010M-010Y-015M-6Y-0M-1SJ-0Y-010SCM-2PZ-0Y 5.26
HXL8088/DUCULA CMSS93Y02492S-2Y-010M-010Y-010M-10Y-1M-0Y-2PZ-0Y 5.26
SHA3/CBRD CMSS92Y00595S-4GH-0M-0SCM-0Y 5.26
TNMU/TUI CMBW89M3847-64M-0AL-5AL-2B-0Y 5.30
ALUCAN/DUCULA CMBW89M3764-36M-0AL-2AL-2B-0Y-5PZ-0Y 5.36
IAS64/ALDAN//URES/3/TNMU/4/TNMU CMBW90M4487-0TOPY-14M-11AL-0AL-07Y-1M-0Y-1SJ-0Y 5.36
SABUF/5/BCN/4/RABI//GS/CRA/3/AE.SQUARROSA (190) CASS94Y00042S-9PR-1M-0M-1Y-0M 5.51
793.3402//BUC/PVN/3/KAUZ/4/NJ8611 CMSS92Y02234T-7Y-015M-015Y-010M-2Y-0M-1SCM-010Y-010SCM-0Y 5.56
SHA3/SERI//SHA4/LIRA CMBW90M2468-12M-010M-010Y-015M-9Y-0M-2SCM-010Y-010SCM-0Y-0SCM 5.61
SHA3/SERI//SHA4/LIRA CMBW90M2468-12M-010M-010Y-015M-10Y-0M 5.65
TNMU/MUNIA CMSS93B01052S-18Y-010M-010Y-010M-6Y-1M-0Y 5.66
NING8745/3/2*CHUM18//JUP/BJY CMBW91Y02939M-030TOPM-9Y-010Y-015M-1Y-0M-0E-0ECU 5.74
R37/GHL121//KAL/BB/3/JUP/MUS/4/2*YMI #6/5/CBRD CMBW91Y01575S-4Y-010M-010Y-015M-2Y-0M-1SCM-010Y-010SCM-3SJ-0Y 5.74
NG8675/CBRD CMSS92Y00639S-1-5SCM-2M-6Y-010SCM-0Y 5.74
THB/CEP7780//SHA4/LIRA CMBW90M2456-9M-010M-010Y-015M-10Y-0M 5.77
SHA3/CBRD CMSS92Y00595S-5GH-0M-0Y-0SCM-0Y 5.85
NL456/VEE#5//PASA/3/BOW/GEN//KAUZ CMSS93Y03376T-44Y-010Y-010M-010Y-8M-0Y 5.88
TUI/MILAN CMSS92Y00540S-030Y-015M-0Y-0Y-18M-0Y 5.88
ISD-75-3-1/MO88//PRL/VEE#6 CMBW90M4731-0TOPY-42M-3Y-010M-3Y-9M-2KBY-05KBY-0B-0KEN 5.93

References

Gilchrist, L., S. Rajaram, M. van Ginkel, A. Mujeeb-Kazi, and J. Franco. 1997a. Characterizing Fusarium graminearum resistance of CIMMYT bread wheat germplasm. Cereal Research Communications 25 (3-2): 655-657.

Gilchrist, L., S. Rajaram, A. Mujeeb-Kazi, M. van Ginkel, H. Vivar, and W. Pfeiffer. 1997b. Fusarium scab screening program at CIMMYT. pp. 7-12 In: Fusarium Head Scab: Global Status and Future Prospects. H.J. Dubin, L. Gilchrist, J. Reeves, and A. McNab (eds.). Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.

Gilchrist, L.; Rajaram, S.; Ginkel, M. van; Velázquez, C.; Crossa, J. 1999. Transferring fusarium head blight resistance from bread wheat sources to high yielding advanced lines. In: National Fusarium Head Blight Forum; Ramkota Inn Sioux Falls, South Dakota; 5-7 Dec 1999. p. 162-163.

Singh, R.P., Hong Ma, and S. Rajaram. 1995. Genetic analysis of resistance to scab in spring wheat cultivar Frontana. Plant Dis. 79:238-240.

Singh, R.P., M. van Ginkel. 1997. Breeding strategies for introgressing diverse scab resistances into adapted wheats. Pp. 86-92 In: Fusarium Head Scab: Global Status and Future Prospects. H.J. Dubin, L. Gilchrist, J. Reeves, and A. McNab (eds.). Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.

Van Ginkel, M., W. van der Schaar, Y. Zhuping, and S. Rajaram. 1996. Inheritance of resistance to scab in two wheat cultivars from Brazil and China. Plant Dis. 80:863-867.


©
CIMMYT
April 2001

 Kronstad Symposium Poster List | Wheat Program | Wheat Research Results