PDF version

 

FURTHER TESTS AT CIMMYT FIND NO PRESENCE OF PROMOTER ASSOCIATED WITH TRANSGENES IN MEXICAN LANDRACES IN GENE BANK 

February 7, 2002

El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico—In January, The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)  completed two additional sets of screening on a total of 39 Mexican maize landraces from its maize gene bank and determined that none of them carried the common promoter (cauliflower mosaic virus 35S, abbreviated as CaMV 35S). If the promoter had been found (and those results verified), it would indicate that a transgenic maize plant had crossed with a direct ancestor of the sampled maize, at some point in the past.

The screening of landrace accessions in the gene bank at CIMMYT was initiated in response to published reports that transgenic corn had been found growing in the Mexican states of Oaxaca and Puebla (September 27 [Vol. 413] and November 29 [Vol. 414], 2001 issues of Nature). To date, all screenings of Mexican maize landraces and varieties at CIMMYT have failed to show the presence of the promoter.

In late November 2001, 15 landraces from the CIMMYT maize gene bank tested negative for the presence of CaMV 35S promoter sequence. This followed similar screenings in mid-October, 2001, in which 28 landraces from the gene bank also failed to indicate the presence of the promoter sequence. At that time, CIMMYT also screened seeds from 42 Oaxacan landraces that were collected in 2000 for a study on gene flow. Again it was determined that the CaMV 35S sequence was not present in any of the samples.

Details of both sets of the new screenings are given below.

Set 1: Germplasm screening of CIMMYT gene bank materials for DNA sequence associated with transgenics (January 2, 2002)

Seeds of 14 Mexican maize accessions from the CIMMYT gene bank collection were received from Dr. Suketoshi Taba, head of the CIMMYT Maize Gene Bank. Nine of the landrace accessions were from the state of Oaxaca while five came from northern Mexico. These seeds were germinated and DNA extracted according to the standard protocols of CIMMYT’s Applied Biotechnology Center (ABC). DNA was amplified using a primer corresponding to the CaMV 35S promoter, a fragment of DNA found in most commercial transgenic maize and not known to exist naturally in the maize genome (sequence available upon request). DNA was extracted in a bulk of 10 plants, and a total of 20-40 plants were tested per population. DNA isolated from a known transformed plant containing the CaMV 35S promoter was run as a positive control. To further ensure that the reactions were working correctly, all DNA samples were amplified using a primer corresponding to a fragment of DNA known to exist naturally in the maize genome. All positive controls amplified correctly, and no bulk of gene bank maize amplified the CaMV 35S promoter sequence, indicating that in the samples tested, there is no CaMV 35S promoter sequence.

Set 2: Germplasm screening of CIMMYT gene bank materials (Zapalote Chico) for DNA sequence associated with transgenics (January 14, 2002)

Seeds of 25 maize landrace accessions were received from the CIMMYT Maize Gene Bank. The accessions were all collected in Oaxaca in 1999 and broadly classified as the race Zapalote Chico.The seeds were germinated and DNA extracted according to CIMMYT-ABC protocols. DNA was amplified using a primer corresponding to the CaMV 35S promoter, a fragment of DNA found in most commercial transgenic maize and not known to exist naturally in the maize genome (sequence available upon request). DNA was extracted from individual plants as a bulk (15 individuals per population). DNA isolated from a known transformed plant containing the CaMV 35S promoter was run as a positive control. To further ensure that the reactions were working correctly, all DNA samples were amplified using a primer corresponding to a fragment of DNA known to exist naturally in the maize genome.

All positive controls amplified correctly. No bulk of an accession amplified the CaMV 35S promoter sequence, thus clearly indicating that the CaMV 35S promoter sequence was not present in any of the samples tested.

Set 1: Test of CIMMYT gene bank materials for the presence of the 35S promoter sequence in maize (January 2, 2002).

Race

CIMMYT accession number

Origin of seeds

Number of seeds tested

Samples amplified 35S

Tablon

347

Jalisco

20

0

--

1946

Nuevo Leon

30

0

Jala

2138

Colima

30

0

Tablon

2230

Jalisco

20

0

Bolita9

2269

Oaxaca

40

0

Zapchi9

2272

Oaxaca

40

0

--

4060

Oaxaca 1970

30

0

--

4060

Oaxaca 1998

20

0

TabPer

5717

Colima

20

0

Conico/Bolita

6040

Oaxaca

20

0

Conico/Bolita

6040

Oaxaca

30

0

Bolita/Pepiti

18031

Oaxaca

30

0

Bolita/Pepiti

18031

Oaxaca

40

0

Bolita

18037

Oaxaca

40

0

Set 2: Test of CIMMYT gene bank materials for the presence of the 35S promoter sequence in maize (January 14, 2002).

Race

Pop. number

Origin of seed

Number of seeds tested

Samples amplified 35S

Zap.Chico

850

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

851

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

852

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

853

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

854

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

855

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

856

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

857

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

858

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

859

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

860

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

861

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

862

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

863

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

864

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

865

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

866

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

867

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

868

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

869

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

870

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

871

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

872

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

873

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

Zap.Chico

874

Oaxaca 1999

15

0

For more information, contact the  Director of CIMMYT's Applied Biotechnology Center, Dr. David Hoisington, at d.hoisington@cgiar.org

This document was prepared in English, and a Spanish translation has been prepared for informational purposes. In the event of any inconsistency between the different versions, however, the English version should be considered the authoritative text.

 

April, 2007